Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Plant Awareness Disparity (PAD) refers to the inability of humans to notice plants and recognize their importance. Among the various factors (e.g., cultural) contributing to PAD, the less prominent visual cues of plants (e.g., color) might be one of the main features making them less noticeable to human perception. Here, we investigated whether PAD affects basic numerosity perception, which represents a fundamental cognitive ability that allows individuals to interpret and interact with their surroundings. Across three experiments, we compared how participants perceive the numerosity of plants (specifically trees), animals, and minerals. Participants completed two tasks: an estimation task, in which they reported the exact number of items in a single set and a comparison task, which required them to discriminate numerosity between two sets of items. In Experiment 1, both tasks employed colored images. We hypothesized that participants would underestimate the number of plant items in comparison to animals and minerals, given that plant stimuli typically attract less attention. In Experiment 2, black and white images were used to test whether the green color of plants contributes to PAD. In Experiment 3, all items were rotated of 180{degrees} to disrupt semantic recognition and assess whether PAD arises from higher-level cognitive processes. Results revealed a consistent underestimation of plants in Experiment 1 and 2, but this effect diminished in Experiment 3. The reduction of this effect suggests that semantic recognition processes may contribute to PAD. These results highlight how cognitive biases toward plants can influence basic perceptual judgments essential for everyday functioning.

Michottes "launching displays" are animations of collision-like interactions between two objects that elicit a stable and robust impression that one object, the launcher, caused another object, the target, to move. Although it is well-known that unexpected disruptions of movement continuation between launcher and target decrease causal impressions in centre-to-centre collisions, the role of observers visual uncertainty around predicted moving trajectories remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we (1) assess observers uncertainty around post-collision moving angles in a trajectory prediction task and (2) collect their causal impression in a causality rating task. In the latter task, observers viewed centre-to-centre collisions with different levels of movement continuity between the launcher and the target disc. By presenting different launch orientations, we exploited the well-known oblique effect to vary trajectory prediction uncertainty within individuals. If observers rely on their trajectory predictions to rate the causality of the collision, we expect their accuracy in (1) to have a systematic influence on their causality rating in (2). We replicate previous findings that observers report stronger causal impressions in trials where the target and the launcher move in the same direction and weaker causal impressions for collisions where the target and the launcher moving trajectory deviated. Furthermore, causality ratings were on average higher for oblique compared to cardinal launch directions, implying that increased sensory uncertainty induces a stronger causal impression. We hope this work will inspire deeper empirical assessments and computational models describing the role of sensory uncertainty and predictive processes in shaping subjective impressions of causality.

How does the structure of events influence the when and the where of experience in comparison to the what? We developed a novel virtual reality (VR) environment to understand how the quantity of information within nested structures influence participants memory for events. Participants moved through a series of virtual rooms (events) where images (items) appeared in randomised locations on a 3 by 3 grid located on a wall. Participants were asked to remember the what (old/new), when (timeline location), and where (grid location), of the images they experienced. Two types of nested events were tested (6 rooms, each containing 4 images; 3 rooms, each containing 8 images) without a difference in the number of seconds of presentation. We found a strong temporal compression effect at nested levels in which participants remembered early items and events happening later, and later items and events happening earlier, than the original experience. Crucially, presenting four-item events resulted in a greater compression rate than eight-item events. We also found greater temporal distances between pairs of items occurring within eight-item events than pairs of items which occurred on either side of a boundary. Memory for when depends on the compression of information within events.

Listeners face many challenges when trying to maintain attention to a target source in everyday settings; for instance, reverberation distorts acoustic cues and interruptions capture attention. However, little is known about how these challenges affect the ability to maintain selective attention. Here, we measured syllable recall accuracy and pupil dilation during a spatial selective attention task that was sometimes disrupted. Participants heard two competing, temporally interleaved syllable streams presented in pseudo-anechoic or reverberant environments. On randomly selected trials, a sudden interruption occurred mid-sequence. Compared to anechoic trials, reverberant performance was worse overall, and the interrupter disrupted performance. In uninterrupted trials, reverberation reduced peak pupil dilation both when it was consistent across all stimuli in a block and when it was randomized trial to trial, suggesting temporal smearing reduced clarity of the scene and the salience of events in the ongoing streams. Pupil dilations in response to interruptions indicated perceptual salience was strong across reverberant and anechoic conditions. Specifically, baseline pupil size before trials did not vary across room conditions, and mixing or blocking of trials (altering stimulus expectations) had no impact on pupillary responses. Together, these findings highlight that stimulus salience drives cognitive load more strongly than does task performance.

Choice overload occurs when an ever-growing number of options impairs decision quality, because evaluating options taxes cognitive resources. We investigated whether reducing cognitive demand could mitigate overload by encouraging greater cognitive effort to achieve optimal choice. We conducted two experiments manipulating cognitive demand in complementary ways: Experiment 1 reduced demand by presenting high-attractiveness sets, and Experiment 2 did so by providing a shortlist tool. In both experiments, participants chose from sets of 6-24 options while their eye-gaze and electroencephalographic (EEG) data were recorded. We found that reducing demand made decisions faster, but did not improve choice performance as set-size increased. Under low-demand conditions, eye-gaze measures revealed narrower search and EEG measures showed reduced working memory engagement per option, together indicating less searching and processing efforts. These results suggest that even with reduced cognitive demand, people coast through easier decisions, conserving effort and leaving the choice overload effect largely intact.

Perceptual processing integrates information from multiple sensory modalities to form a coherent representation of the environment. A classic example of such is the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion (SIFI), where the perceived number of visual flashes is altered by conflicting auditory stimuli. While the SIFI is a well-established phenomenon of multisensory integration, the influence of physical spatial characteristics--specifically stimulus eccentricity and spatial congruence--on integration levels remains debated.To address this gap, this study used the SIFI paradigm to investigate the effect of visual stimulus spatial location and the spatial congruence between auditory and visual stimuli on audiovisual integration. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that when spatial attention was controlled via cueing, unimodal visual performance remained consistent across locations. However, the susceptibility to SIFI increased progressively from the central to the peripheral visual field, exhibiting a spatial pattern of Gaussian distribution. Bayesian modeling further supported this by showing that this spatial modulation was driven by an increase in the integration weight assigned audiovisual representations in the periphery, rather than changes in sensory uncertainty alone. Conversely, Experiment 3 demonstrated that the spatial congruence of audiovisual stimuli did not affect the SIFI or alter the integration processing. These findings refine our current understanding of the spatial modulation upon audiovisual integration. By incorporating the visual systems spatial properties into a Bayesian framework, we provide a computational explanation for the eccentricity-dependent nature of multisensory integration.

Entrainment and predictive coding aid speech perception in both quiet and noisy environments. Isochronous, periodic auditory rhythmic cues facilitate entrainment and temporal expectations which can benefit encoding and perception of target speech. However, most studies using isochronous cues confound periodicity with predictability. To this end, we characterized how systematic changes in the acoustic dimensions of stimulus rate, target phase, periodicity, and predictably of an entraining sound precursor impact the subsequent identification of concurrent speech targets. Target concurrent vowel pairs were preceded by rhythmic woodblock cues which were either periodic-predictable (PP, isochronous rhythm), aperiodic-predictable (AP, accelerating rhythm), or aperiodic-unpredictable (AU, random rhythm). The number of pulses per rhythm was roved to further manipulate predictability. Stimuli also varied in presentation rate (2.5, 4.5, 6.5 Hz) and target speech phase (in-phase, 0{degrees}; out-of-phase, 90{degrees}, 180{degrees}) relative to the preceding entraining rhythm. We also measured participants musical pulse continuation and standardized speech-in-noise perception abilities. We did not observe any effects of stimulus rhythm, rate, or target phase on target speech identification accuracy. However, reaction times were slowest at the nominal speech rate (4.5 Hz) and were most disrupted by out-of-phase presentations following the PP rhythm. Double-vowel task performance was associated with stronger musical pulse continuation abilities, but not speech-in-noise perception. Our results support the notion that entraining rhythmic cues rely on top-down processing but are relatively muted when stimulus predictability is unknown. Additionally, we find that individual differences in musical pulse perception may underlie the benefits of rhythmic cueing on subsequent speech perception.

When successive stimuli occur close enough together in time, their perception can be impaired. Such impairments indicate temporal competition between successive stimuli for representational resources. Voluntary temporal attention can bias processing resources in favor of a behaviorally relevant moment, improving perception at the attended time at the expense of impairments at unattended times. However it is unclear whether these perceptual tradeoffs across time arise because voluntary temporal attention selects among actively competing stimulus representations, such as within visual working memory, or if instead, temporal attention facilitates stimulus processing prior to a competitive stage. Here we used a temporal cueing task with up to two targets in succession to test whether and how the effects of temporal attention depend on temporal competition. We found that voluntary temporal attention improved performance even in the absence of temporal competition, when only one stimulus appeared during the trial. Moreover, the magnitude of attentional enhancement was comparable with and without competition. These results suggest that voluntary temporal attention enhances perception by facilitating processing prior to a competitive stage, rather than by resolving conflicts between actively competing stimulus representations. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=126 SRC="FIGDIR/small/705419v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1f8dforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10a33f1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d81cfborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@56a432_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Visual perception of symbolic numerals is essential for everyday tasks; however, the neural and perceptual mechanisms underlying this ability remain unclear. Partially occluded digital numerals can elicit bistable perception, and adaptation to symbolic numerals alters the perception of these ambiguous stimuli. We aimed to examine how symbolic numeral adaptation is related to hierarchical visual processing by testing its interocular and interhemifield transfer. Experiment 1 tested interocular transfer by presenting the test stimulus to either the same or opposite eye as the adaptation stimulus. Experiment 2 assessed interhemifield transfer by presenting the test stimulus to either the same or opposite hemifield as the adaptation stimulus. Experiment 3 examined the interhemifield transfer of adaptation confined to the upper parts of digital numerals. Our results showed that adaptation to digital numerals induced shifted perceptual interpretations that transferred across eyes. In addition, we found that adaptation to digital numerals induced a relatively small but statistically significant interhemifield transfer. In contrast, adaptation restricted to the upper parts of digital numerals showed no significant interhemifield transfer. These findings suggest that the perceptual interpretation of symbolic numerals involves visual processing stages that integrate information across the eyes and hemifields.

Eye-movement-related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs) are pressure changes recorded in the ear that supposedly reflect displacements of the tympanic membrane induced by saccadic eye movements. Previous studies hypothesized that the underlying mechanisms might play a role in combining visual and acoustic spatial information. Yet, whether and how the eardrum moves during an EMREO and whether this movement affects acoustic spatial perception remains unclear. We here probed human acoustic lateralization performance for sounds presented at different times during a saccade (hence the EMREO) in two tasks, one relying on free-field sounds and one presenting sounds in-ear. Since the EMREO generation likely involves the middle ear muscles, whose tension can alter sound transmission, it is possible that judgements of sound locations may vary with the state of the ERMEO at the time of sound presentation. However, when testing two specific hypotheses of how movements of the eardrum underlying the EMREO may affect spatial hearing, we found no evidence in support of this. Still, and in line with previous studies, we found that participants lateralization responses were shaped by the spatial congruency of the saccade target direction and the sound direction. Thus, either the eardrum does not move directly as reflected by the EMREO signal, or despite its movement the underlying changes at the tympanic membrane only have minimal perceptual impact. Our results call for more refined studies to understand how the eardrum moves during a saccade and whether or how the EMREO impacts spatial perception.

Stored memories are useless unless they are available for retrieval. Thus, investigating different ways to modulate retrieval is crucial. Novelty has been extensively studied as a modulator of memory. In this study, we investigated whether exposure to a novel event, an innovative neuroscience lesson, can enhance memory retrieval and divergent thinking in high school students. Across three experiments, we assessed the timing and mechanisms underlying these effects. In experiment 1, we found that memory retrieval was enhanced when the novel lesson occurred immediately before a memory test, but not when it was presented one hour earlier. In experiment 2, we found that the same immediate novelty exposure improved divergent thinking performance. Finally, in experiment 3, we explored potential shared mechanisms using a competition protocol and revealed that novelty improved divergent thinking regardless of its timing relative to memory retrieval. However, memory retrieval benefited only when tested immediately before the divergent thinking task. These results suggest that novelty boosts both memory retrieval and divergent thinking, but through partially distinct mechanisms. Our findings demonstrate that a simple, real-world classroom intervention can effectively enhance key cognitive functions in students. Significance StatementStored memories are only valuable if they can be retrieved, and memory retrieval plays a key role in creative thinking. Here, we tested whether a simple, novel event, a neuroscience lesson, could enhance memory retrieval and creative thinking in a real-world classroom setting. We found that novelty improved both memory retrieval and divergent thinking, an aspect of creative thinking, when presented immediately before the task. Finally, we revealed a non-reciprocal competition effect between memory retrieval and divergent thinking. These findings highlight a practical, low-cost intervention to boost key cognitive functions in students, demonstrating that brief, well-timed novel experiences can support both learning and creative thinking in educational environments.

Humans can predict an objects motion better if its movements are consistent with gravity. Here we investigate whether this may be due to an internalized strong Earth gravity prior or to vestibular cues reporting instantaneous information about gravity. These two directions can be separated using virtual reality by providing strong visual cues to the direction of up which may or may not be aligned with true gravity. Participants were presented with a ball travelling on a parabola path simulated with either downward acceleration created by simulated Earths gravity (1g) or inverted gravity (-1g) resulting in the ball curving upwards. In both types of trial, the ball disappeared at between 57.5% and 75% of its full trajectory - after it had started its descent in the case of 1g or ascent in the case of -1g. Participants pressed a mouse button when they judged the ball to have got back to the height at which it was launched. Participants were either standing or supine. There were no differences in the estimated time to reach the indicated level between the 1g and -1g simulations, however, we found an overestimation of the perceived time for the ball to reach target height when observers were lying supine compared to when they were standing upright independent of the gravity condition simulated. A control experiment confirmed that this was not due to a general slowing of reaction times while lying supine versus while upright. To explore whether these observations might reflect posture-related changes in vestibular activity, participants completed the task under both simulated gravity conditions while seated upright in the presence of disruptive galvanic vestibular stimulation (dGVS) or during sham stimulation. As when lying supine, the perceived time for the ball to reach the target height was significantly longer in the presence of dGVS compared to during sham stimulation. Overall, participants were no better at anticipating 1g motion compared to -1g motion, but we provide compelling evidence that the state of vestibular signalling can impact the prediction of object motion.

Signal detection theory posits that subjects in two-stimulus, two-choice discrimination tasks decide by comparing random samples of an evidence variable to a static decision criterion. While the core assumptions of the theory have received ample experimental support, it has become evident that the decision criterion is not static but subject to trial-by-trial fluctuations and can be influenced by experimental manipulations. The mechanisms governing the trial-by-trial criterion changes are however not well understood. Here, we report results from five experiments in which we subjected rats to a two-stimulus, two-choice auditory discrimination task. In the first three experiments, we investigated the effects of stimulus presentation ratios and reward ratios and provide clear evidence that the effects of changing reward ratios are more pronounced than those of stimulus presentation ratios. A model-based analysis revealed that this effect was due to more than tenfold higher learning rates when reward ratios were manipulated. In two separate experiments, we investigated the effect of reward density (i.e., global reward rate) on criterion learning but failed to find consistent effects. A systematic comparison of three different trial-by-trial criterion learning models based on detection theory, the matching law, and reinforcement learning showed that no model was able to capture the differential effects of stimulus presentation and reward ratios. We conclude that subjects explicitly represent either prior stimulus probabilities or entire stimulus distributions, and accordingly future models need to represent these factors as well.

Visual working memory allows for the brief maintenance of information to serve behavioral goals. It has been shown that when the specific action required to serve a future goal is predictable, people can flexibly change a visual memory representation to incorporate an action-based one, demonstrating the goal-oriented nature of visual working memory. Can such flexibility also be observed within the visual domain, between color and space? In this eye-tracking study, participants remembered either a centrally presented color or a spatial position around fixation. Critically, when remembering a color the response wheel was either randomly rotated, or shown at a fixed rotation, on every trial. When fixed, every target color could be associated with a predictable position on the wheel during response. Do people incorporate this added spatial information in their behavior? Participants utilized color-space associations when remembering color: Response initiation happened faster when the color wheel was fixed compared to random, irrespective of whether an action could be planned or not. Next, we showed that gaze was biased towards the position of the spatial memory target during the delay, extending previous work on gaze biases. Importantly, also when remembering a color, gaze was biased towards the anticipated position of that color on the response wheel when it was fixed. Together, our results show a behavioral benefit of added spatial information for color memory, and systematic changes in gaze that reflect flexible utilization of space.

Virtual Reality (VR) applications depend on eliciting spatial presence, the subjective experience of being physically located within a virtual environment. Although individual differences have long been theorised to contribute to this experience, their role in highly immersive VR systems remains contested. The present study investigated whether trait absorption predicts spatial presence and whether this relationship is mediated by attention allocation. Seventy participants (44 female, 26 male; M age = 22.90, SD = 4.88) completed a 6-minute VR session using a Meta Quest 3 Head-Mounted Display and validated self-report measures of trait absorption (Tellegen Absorption Scale), attention allocation, and spatial presence (MEC-Spatial Presence Questionnaire). Path analysis confirmed a significant, complete mediation pathway: trait absorption positively predicted attention allocation ({beta} = 0.27, p = .013), which in turn strongly predicted spatial presence ({beta} = 0.54, p < .001). The direct path from absorption to spatial presence was non-significant ({beta} = 0.11, p = .325), indicating complete mediation. The indirect effect was significant ({beta} = 0.15; 95% BCa CI [0.025, 0.291]). The model explained a sizeable 33.8% of the variance in spatial presence (Cohens f{superscript 2} = 0.51). Post-hoc dose-response analysis revealed that trait absorption acts as a cognitive amplifier: the strength of the attention-presence relationship tripled from low-absorption ({beta} = 0.33, R{superscript 2} = .15) to high-absorption individuals ({beta} = 1.00, R{superscript 2} = .56). These findings demonstrate that individual differences remain important in highly immersive VR by modulating the effectiveness of attentional focus, offering promising directions for tailoring VR interventions.

Sensory representations are inherently noisy, and monitoring this noise is essential for effective decision-making. This metacognitive ability of evaluating the quality of ones perceptual decision is referred to as perceptual confidence. However, whether perceptual confidence accurately tracks internal noise remains unresolved. Peripheral vision provides a natural testing ground for this question, yet previous studies report mixed results complicated by different definitions and measurements of confidence. Here, we used a normative Bayesian framework with incentivized confidence measurements to address these discrepancies. We tested the Bayesian-confidence hypothesis that confidence is derived from the posterior probability distribution of the feature being judged, given noisy sensory measurements. We tested two perceptual tasks while varying stimulus eccentricity: spatial localization and orientation estimation. We measured confidence by post-decision wagering, by which participants set a symmetrical range around the perceptual estimates. Participants earned higher reward for narrower confidence ranges but received zero reward if the range did not enclose the target. We estimated sensory noise from the perceptual responses to predict confidence, assuming that sensory noise linearly increases with eccentricity. We then compared a normative Bayesian model with three alternative models that challenged different assumptions. Across both tasks, the Bayesian ideal-observer model best predicted confidence. These results suggest that humans can accurately monitor the increased internal noise in peripheral vision and use this information to make optimal confidence judgments.

Multitasking is generally regarded as detrimental to performance. This deterioration effect is typically explained by the interference among tasks due to the limited capacity of information-processing resources, which in turn reduces the performance in each task. Contrary to this general view, we report evidence for a facilitation effect of multitasking on performance. This facilitation effect was observed in multitasking on a handgrip muscular endurance task and cognitive task, which are known to have little interference with each other. Specifically, we found that performance in the endurance task was facilitated with the difficulty of the concurrent cognitive task. This facilitation effect was mediated by additional pupil dilation due to the cognitive task. Increased effort with the difficulty of the cognitive task cannot explain the facilitated performance in the irrelevant endurance task. Instead, they suggest that the cognitive task elevated overall arousal to a level unattainable by the endurance task alone, which in turn facilitated performance in the irrelevant endurance task. To further test this arousal account, we manipulated participants motivation to the cognitive task by reward without changing its difficulty and found the same pattern of results. Thus, it is not effort or motivation specific to the cognitive task but rather overall arousal level that underlies the facilitation effect. These results unveiled a previously overlooked mechanism: a multitasking-induced arousal boost. Our findings suggest that multitasking can facilitate performance when the net effect of adding a concurrent task is governed less by the capacity limitation and more by the elevation of overall arousal.

Observing touch activates brain regions similar to those activated by experiencing actual touch, suggesting that visual information can cross-modally influence tactile perception. In this electroencephalography (EEG) study, we investigated how viewing visual displays of an arm being touched may affect the perception and processing of digitally rendered touch patterns designed to resemble either stroking or tapping. Thirty-one participants experienced touch patterns delivered to their left forearm via a wearable sleeve while viewing either a photo of an arm or spatiotemporally aligned videos of an arm being touched in synchrony with either of the two touch patterns. Continuity and pleasantness ratings of touch stimuli were higher for stroking than for tapping. Correlations between continuity and pleasantness ratings were stronger when touch was accompanied by videos of touch than by the photo of an arm. Analysis of evoked brain responses revealed visual modulation of touch processing at centroparietal electrodes beginning at around 0.9 s, with the cross-modal effects diverging between stroking and tapping at about 1.6 s. Furthermore, the interaction effects of cross-modal influences between stroking and tapping at the neural level positively correlated with the visual modulation of pleasantness ratings in two right frontal clusters at around 1.4 s and 1.8 s. These results suggest that observing touch influences the perception and processing of touch through initial sensory integration at centroparietal sites, followed by later frontal valuation processes. This extends previous findings on affective touch by demonstrating that visual inputs can cross-modally shape the hedonic evaluation of digitally actuated touch.

When individuals view the same visual input, they often differ in their aesthetic appeal judgments, yet why people differ remains largely unclear. Here, we tested whether individual differences in aesthetic experience are linked to differences in visual exploration. In two experiments, participants watched the documentary "Home" while their eye movements were recorded. In Experiment 1, participants continuously rated aesthetic experience throughout the movie, whereas in Experiment 2, they watched the first half without a task and rated aesthetic experience only during the second half. Inter-individual similarity in gaze patterns, assessed using fixation heatmaps across time, predicted similarity in aesthetic appeal judgments in both experiments. Notably, in Experiment 2, gaze similarity during free viewing in the first half of the movie predicted similarity in aesthetic ratings during the second half, indicating that incidental eye movement patterns predict aesthetic experiences. Together, these results show that shared gaze patterns are linked to shared aesthetic experiences under naturalistic, dynamic viewing conditions.

Each individual person looks at natural scenes in their own unique way, resulting in a distinct perceptual experience of the world. However, little is known about why such differences in gaze emerge. Here, we test the hypothesis that idiosyncrasies in gaze behavior are predicted by inter-subject variations in internal models--expectations about how scenes typically look. In two experiments, we first characterized participants personal internal models by asking them to draw typical bathroom and kitchen scenes. Individual differences in these drawings were quantified using an objective deep learning pipeline and, in turn, related to individual differences in gaze behavior. In Experiment 1, where participants freely viewed a set of kitchen and bathroom photographs, inter-subject similarities in internal models did not predict inter-subject similarities in gaze. In Experiment 2, we encouraged strategic exploration through gaze-contingent viewing and a memory task. Here, inter-subject similarities in internal models predicted similarities in fixation frequency and the sequence in which different object categories were inspected. These findings suggest that the influence of internal models on visual exploration is stronger under increased sensory uncertainty and when expectation-guided sampling of the environment is encouraged. Together, our results provide new insights into how individual expectations shape gaze behavior and help explain why people differ in how they explore the visual world.