Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Visual search is a critical component of many professions such as military operations, baggage screening, and radiology. Aided Target Recognition (AiTR) systems are designed to highlight potential threats across the operator visual field in real-time, directing attention and improving accuracy. However, these systems may impact search and, consequently, situational awareness by diverting attentional resources from non-highlighted, yet relevant, locations. Previous work suggests that scene gist is extracted within the first 250 ms of scene onset (Vo & Henderson, 2010). As such, this study examined whether a 250 ms AiTR onset delay could encourage a more even distribution of attention. Participants searched synthetically generated scenes and classified each person in the scene as armed or unarmed. Depending on their condition, participants either saw the scenes unaugmented (No AiTR condition), with AiTR highlights consisting of red bounding boxes around armed people and yellow boxes around unarmed (AiTR condition), or with AiTR highlights presented 250 ms post scene onset (Delayed AiTR condition). A surprise memory test of background objects presented in the search scenes was administered to all participants upon completion of the search task. As predicted and preregistered, results showed less overt attentional deployment to background information (anything other than the people themselves) in the AiTR condition compared to No AiTR , however, decreased overt attentional deployment was not seen in the Delayed AiTR group. A similar pattern was observed in the memory data (with the AiTR condition having a lower score than the No AiTR condition and the Delayed AiTR condition), this difference was not significant.

Covert spatial attention selects and prioritizes relevant sensory information. Endogenous attention is voluntary, goal-driven, and flexible. However, it cannot alleviate visual polar-angle asymmetries, specifically, the horizontal-vertical anisotropy and the vertical meridian asymmetry. Visual perception is affected by both current sensory inputs and contextual information over time and space, such as the perception of preceding trials. Previous studies reported sequential effects whereby attention interacts with response repetitions. But it is unknown whether and how endogenous attention modulation on performance varies as a function of target location and trial history. Here, we reanalyzed data from three published studies of endogenous attention in orientation discrimination tasks, to (1) assess the typical sequential effects on response, in which response to the current trial is biased toward the previous one, and (2) examine if sequential effects would modulate the performance across locations, across four dimensions: (1) location, (2) feature, (3) attention repetition condition, and (4) the correctness of the preceding (n -1) trial. First, we demonstrated typical sequential effects of response repetition to the repeated location and feature aspects of the target. Second, we found a robust effect of attention on performance, but the results did not reveal evidence of sequential attention effects as a function of the four dimensions in any of the three studies. Moreover, there were no interactions between attention and location when considering trial history. Together, these findings provide compelling evidence that visual polar-angle asymmetries are resistant to endogenous attention, and that even top- down factors-sequential effects-do not alleviate these asymmetries in performance.

When we feel restless and easily distracted, continuously switching tasks (exploration), our pupils tend to be large. In contrast, when we are calmly focused on a single task (exploitation), our pupils tend to be small. According to the Adaptive Gain Theory (AGT), a switch from exploitation to exploration is associated with an increase in norepinephrine in the locus coeruleus, which in turn triggers pupil dilation. However, the AGT does not provide a functional explanation of why exploration triggers pupil dilation. One possibility is that visual sensitivity, which increases with pupil size, is especially important during exploration. We set out to provide evidence consistent with this functional explanation, as well as to replicate two key previous results. Participants performed a four-armed bandit task, which induces both exploration and exploitation behavior. During the task, participants also needed to detect an occasional and unpredictable near-threshold peripheral flash. We replicated two key results: pupils were larger during exploration than during exploitation; and increased pupil size (overall, independent of exploration status) was associated with increased visual sensitivity. However, most importantly, we did not find that visual sensitivity was higher during exploration than during exploitation; probably, the reliable-yet-tiny increase in pupil size during exploration was too small to affect visual sensitivity. We conclude that key previous results are replicable; however, common experimental paradigms, such as the four-armed bandit task, induce only small changes in exploration behavior. Therefore, more powerful paradigms are required in order to test functional explanations of pupil-size changes during exploration and exploitation.

The critical flicker fusion (CFF) threshold is a psychophysical measure used to quantify the temporal resolution of the visual system and is known to vary across individuals. However, it is unclear if this measure is stimulus-specific, or if it may represent a more fundamental processing rate for visual perception in general. Here, we assess if individual variation in CFF is predictive of two features of visual processing that are dependent on temporal perception: the attentional blink and global motion sensitivity. In a non-clinical sample of 84 individuals, flicker fusion thresholds were predictive of the magnitude of the attentional blink. In contrast, we found no link between flicker fusion and global motion sensitivity in a sample of 79 individuals. Our results suggest that CFF reflects a visual processing rate that impacts other, more complex perceptual tasks.

During active vision, the brain must coordinate where to move the eyes with predictions about upcoming sensory input. Before each saccade, perception is enhanced at the upcoming fixation location, but whether this enhancement depends on expectations about target features remains unknown. Here, participants prepared a saccade to a cued location while reporting the presence and orientation of a brief visual target that appeared either at the saccade goal or at the opposite location. Feature expectation was manipulated across blocks by varying the probability of the two target orientations. Perceptual sensitivity (d') increased when targets were presented at the saccade goal, consistent with presaccadic enhancement, and was also higher for less expected features. However, these effects were independent: feature probability did not alter the magnitude of presaccadic enhancement. Moreover, presaccadic enhancement increased near saccade onset, whereas the advantage for less expected features weakened as movement onset approached. Saccade latency revealed a contrasting pattern. Visual targets presented at the saccade goal delayed movement initiation. This delay depended on feature probability, with longer latencies for unexpected than for expected features only when saccades were directed towards the target. This location-specific effect persisted after accounting for perceptual report, and the latency cost for unexpected features was reproduced in a follow-up experiment. Together, these findings show that feature probability enhanced sensitivity to unexpected information independently of presaccadic enhancement, while selectively delaying saccade initiation towards targets with unexpected features. This dissociation suggests that feature expectation modulates perception and action through functionally distinct forms of visual processing.

Perception is typically biased towards prior expectations. In some cases, however, it seems repelled away from expectations, such that percepts appear less like what is expected. Even more intriguingly, separate studies have recently reported that predictions derived from gravity may shape perception in opposing ways. Specifically, gravity causes unsupported objects to accelerate downwards, leading to two predictions; that objects will move downwards (location prior) and at an increasing speed (acceleration prior). There is evidence that perceptual judgements are attracted towards location priors yet repelled from acceleration ones. Here we examine these effects in the same paradigm to determine whether they result from different types of stimuli and judgement, or more interestingly, might result from opposite influences of common predictive mechanisms influencing perception. We first replicate previous reports of a systematic bias to report upward moving objects as more accelerating than downward moving objects: effectively a repulsion from acceleration priors. We then show that the effect applies both at the level of retinal space and due to contextual cues concerning gravitational direction. Finally, we find that participants errors in a location reproduction task are similarly consistent with a repulsion from acceleration priors and, simultaneously, with an attraction towards location priors. We conclude by considering the ways in which these concurrent attractive and repulsive biases may reflect mechanisms optimising fast, accurate, and informative experiences in our ever-changing sensory world, therefore optimising the interface between perception and learning. Public Significance StatementIn a series of behavioural experiments, we show that expectations about how objects move due to gravity concurrently attract perception towards the prediction that objects move downwards, and repel perception away from the prediction that they do so at an increasing rate. These opposing influences inform current theories of perceptual processing, which explain how expectations may generate percepts that are fast, veridical, and informative.

Past sensory experience shapes our perceptual decision-making in the now. Popular models frame perceptual decisions as either attracted towards or repelled away from recent sensory information, but it is unclear when and why these distinct effects emerge. We here ask whether effects turn from attractive to repulsive depending on the level of surprise elicited by the precision-weighted discrepancy between past and present sensory states. This model is based upon the idea that attraction is adaptive for optimizing efficiency and accuracy when discrepancies are small, because they likely reflect sensory noise rather than real change in the environment. In contrast, repulsion may reflect the upweighting of counterfactual evidence when discrepancies are large because they more likely signal the need for model updating. We test this model on a large amount of recently-collated trial-by-trial serial dependence data and consistently find support for it across the dataset, participant, and trial-by-trial level. Specifically, serial dependence effects are attractive at low discrepancies between past and current sensory states but turn repulsive when discrepancies are larger. Higher sensory precision is found to accelerate this flip by reducing the modal discrepancy threshold required to trigger repulsion effects. We discuss how these findings necessitate extending existing theories of serial dependence, and how they may resolve conflicts in the broader predictive processing, learning and perception literatures.

Filling-in occurs during the perceptual disappearance of a blank figure presented on a textured background. Current models of perceptual filling-in are based on a two-stage model where the figure boundary weakens after a period of adaptation, followed by the spreading of the background representation into the region representing the figure. This suggests a competition between figure boundary and background representations whereby filling-in is facilitated by a weaker boundary representation and a stronger background representation. Here, we test this interpretation, by using the oblique effect and surround-modulation suppression, which are functional properties of early visual cortex that modulate the expected strengths of the responses to the background texture and to the figure boundary. In a sample of N=58 participants, we found more filling-in with background textures of cardinal compared to oblique orientations (earlier onset time, with more and longer episodes of filling-in per trial), in line with a known, stronger neuronal response for cardinal than for oblique orientation in early visual cortex. We found more filling-in when the main axis of the rectangular figure was iso-oriented rather than cross-oriented with the background texture (more and longer episodes of filling-in per trial, but no change in onset time), in line with a lower response to oriented stimuli when surrounded by iso-oriented flankers compared to cross-oriented flankers. Overall, our results support the two-stage model and suggest the involvement of early visual cortical areas characterized by the oblique effect and orientation- tuned surround-suppression.

Reflecting how we organize visual experience in everyday memory, visual working memory is increasingly understood as a system in which individual item representations are organized within structures rather than maintained in isolation. Among these, relational structure may be especially consequential because, by specifying how one item value lies relative to another within a feature space, it could allow information about one remembered value to constrain which values are plausible for the other. Yet demonstrating such constraint is challenging because item-specific mnemonic evidence and relational evidence ordinarily support essentially the same estimate. We broke this equivalence with biased post-encoding feedback for one item, making item-specific and relation-based predictions for the other diverge. Across three experiments, participants remembered two sequentially presented orientations, with feedback for one shifted slightly clockwise or counterclockwise from its actual value. Participants incorporated this bias into memory for the feedback-provided orientation; critically, it also appeared in reports of the other orientation, which received no feedback, in the direction predicted by the signed angular offset linking the two remembered values. This feedback transfer weakened with increasing angular separation but occurred in both directions between the first and second orientations. These findings show that relational structure directly constrains individual value estimates in visual working memory, even for items encountered separately. By dissociating normally coincident item-specific and relation-based predictions, our approach reveals an otherwise hidden relational contribution. A probabilistic account explains these findings through joint inference from uncertain item-specific and relational evidence, with their relative uncertainties governing transfer strength.

Language production requires the coordination of multiple cognitive processes. The ability to anticipate and override a habitual response in favor of a contextually-appropriate response are key subprocesses of cognitive control which enable speakers to communicate effectively. Word retrieval involves the co-activation of semantically related alternatives from which the speaker must select the appropriate target representation. Although cognitive control mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to resolving semantic interference during language production, the nature of these control processes remain unclear. Studies investigating the temporal dynamics of cognitive control during decision making tasks have led to a distinction between two operating processes: proactive control, initiated prior to the occurrence of conflict, and reactive control recruited after conflict is detected. We investigated the roles of proactive and reactive control in resolving interference between competing linguistic representations during word retrieval. We analyzed congruency sequence effects combined with delta-plot distributional analyses to dissociate potential adjustments in proactive versus reactive cognitive control in a picture-naming task manipulating semantic context compared to a minimally-linguistic Stroop-like paradigm. Reaction time distributional properties following semantically related trials revealed the engagement of proactive control in semantic interference resolution during word retrieval in the PWI task. In contrast, reactive inhibitory control was engaged in resolving semantic interference following low conflict trials. This distinction was not present in the minimally-linguistic task, which did not appear to engage adaptive control to the same extent. These findings demonstrate that both proactive and reactive cognitive control mechanisms contribute to language production, and are engaged dynamically, adjusting trial-by-trial to resolve semantic interference during word retrieval. In addition, our study provides important insight into the comparison of language with other cognitive domains and positions linguistic paradigms as being instrumental in the study of cognitive control dynamics.

Serial dependence is influenced by sensory uncertainty and contextual continuity, but it remains controversial whether these influences reflect separate mechanisms or different expressions of a shared updating process. Across two time reproduction experiments (N = 44), we examined how motion coherence and coherence transitions modulated the attraction of recent temporal history while controlling for central tendency effects from the current stimulus. In Experiment 1, the low coherence led to stronger serial dependence compared to the high coherence. In Experiment 2, enhanced coherence categories introduced salient contextual boundaries; serial dependence was markedly stronger on the same category transition than switch transition. A three-state Kalman filter model, comprising fast (serial dependence), slow (central tendency), and bias (decision carryover) states captured these patterns through coherence-dependent modulation of fast-state process noise and Kalman gain. Within the tested model space, this precision-weighting account was selected in both experiments; with little evidence that an explicit state reset was needed. These findings support the precision-weighted updating account in which recent history is weighted according to the reliability and stability of the current perceptual environment.

Humans rely on multiple sensory modalities, such as vision, audition, and touch, to perceive materials in everyday life. Previous research shows that multisensory perception leads to facilitation, yet the mechanisms responsible for this facilitation remain poorly understood. One potential mechanism is crossmodal prediction, whereby input from one modality generates predictions about another. While substantial research on multisensory facilitation has focused on bottom-up processes, such as spatial, temporal, and semantic congruency, the role of crossmodal predictions, particularly in material perception, has received little attention. To address this gap, we conducted two experiments, a reaction time task and a material rating task, in which participants viewed computer-generated animations of familiar objects being dropped to the ground. The paradigm exploited the natural temporal structure of impact events: pre-impact visual appearance provides information about an objects material and therefore can generate expectations about the forthcoming impact sound. Critically, participants saw the event only until before the impact, after which the video was masked. Thus, vision and audition were temporally aligned but not presented concurrently, allowing us to isolate the influence of visually driven expectations on the incoming auditory information without a bottom-up conflict. In some trials, the sound matched the expected material, but in a subset, it was incongruent, violating expectations elicited by the preceding visual information. Across both experiments, participants took longer to respond on incongruent than congruent trials, suggesting increased processing demands. In the rating task, incongruent trials also shifted material judgments, such that ratings reflected a weighted combination of incoming auditory information and visually driven predictions, with large individual differences in relative cue weighting. These findings suggest that priors on material properties from one modality, specifically vision, not only establish high-level expectations within the modality about an objects future state, but also extend across modalities.

During sideways movement of an observer, optic flow parsing - in which an objects speed in the world is extracted from all the other visual movement present in the scene, self-generated and otherwise - has been shown to be incomplete, leading to biases in speed perception, particularly when object and observer are moving in opposite directions. Here, we assess how judgements about the speed of objects moving in depth (judged relative to the world) towards or away from an observer (6 m/s) are affected by simultaneous movement of the observer either in the same or opposite direction as the object. In a virtual reality display, participants (n = 25) viewed a sphere simulated as moving in a corridor either while they were stationary or during visually simulated self-motion in the same or opposite direction as the object. They judged the spheres movement relative to the world by comparing its motion to a probe sphere that travelled laterally across the corridor in front of them. In a second experiment (n = 28) participants performed the same task but during faster self-motion (10 m/s). The second cohort also judged the direction in which the object was perceived to move during the same combinations of self and object speeds. Object speed was overestimated when the object travelled in the direction opposite to the observer compared to how objects motion was judged when the observer was stationary. However, object speed was also overestimated during self-motion in the same direction as the object where participants were also much more likely to misjudge the direction of motion of the object. Precision of judgements was lower when self-motion was simulated than it was for stationary observers. A simple arithmetic model of flow parsing fails to capture these results satisfactorily, suggesting that different mechanisms may be at play when the observer travels in the same direction as a moving object and is vulnerable to misperceiving its direction of travel.

Children often outperform adults in probabilistic statistical learning tasks, yet the mechanisms underlying this developmental advantage remain poorly understood. Here, we used eye-tracking measures of belief updating to examine how children and adults acquire and update predictions in a probabilistic sequence-learning task. Using the standard (oculomotor) reaction time measure, children showed stronger statistical learning than adults, replicating previous behavioral findings while revealing a more detailed profile of developmental differences in statistical learning. Critically, children updated their predictions more frequently: they were less likely to repeat previous predictions and more likely to shift their expectations in response to new input. Adults, in contrast, showed greater persistence, tending to maintain prior predictions even when those predictions were inconsistent with the underlying statistical structure. Despite these pronounced differences in updating behavior, the processing and use of prediction errors were remarkably similar across age groups. These findings indicate that developmental differences in statistical learning do not primarily arise from how prediction errors are computed, but rather from how prior beliefs and incoming information are weighted during belief updating. Children's enhanced learning may therefore reflect reduced reliance on stable priors and greater sensitivity to current sensory evidence, supporting a more exploratory learning strategy. Adults, by contrast, appear to favor an exploitative strategy that stabilizes existing predictions but reduces flexibility in probabilistic environments. More broadly, the results suggest that developmental changes in statistical learning may reflect age-related differences in how readily learners revise their predictions in response to incoming evidence. By integrating sensitive oculomotor measures with analyses that probe the mechanisms underlying belief updating, the present study provides a more fine-grained account of how predictive learning changes across development and offers a framework for reconciling previously inconsistent developmental findings in statistical learning.

Mental representations are the explanatory construct of the cognitive sciences, but there is no widely accepted characterization of how they cause behavior. Visual representational geometry can be quantified by similarity scores, but almost all methods require an explicit judgment. To examine how representations cause behavior by varying task demands, observers must perform different tasks while continuously reporting similarity, leading to dual-task interference. This study develops scanpaths as an implicit similarity measure, and uses representational similarity analysis to validate it. Observers searched for a target; fixations on distractors may reveal similarity. Similarity was also quantified by an odd-one-out task in the same participants, and ratings from different participants (Jiang et al. 2022). Representational geometries between tasks correlated. A generative model predicted first fixations in novel data. This double validation of the scanpath method opens the door to examining the causality of representations by determining if and how they vary with task demands.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility, validity, and scalability of PLFest, an open-source, Unity-based, cross-platform application designed for standardized, multi-site visual and cognitive assessment and training. Methods: Two hundred sixty participants (mean age = 23 years) were recruited across four university sites in the United States. Participants completed a battery of five visual assessments administered through PLFest, including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, spatial frequency cutoff, contrast sensitivity at spatial-frequency cutoff, and visual search. Five cognitive assessments measuring visuospatial working memory, verbal working memory, fluid reasoning, inhibitory control, and selective attention were also administered. Descriptive statistics and performance distributions were examined and compared with normative data. Results: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures closely matched previously reported normative values obtained using established clinical and psychophysical methods. Spatial frequency cutoff and visual search tasks produced stable threshold estimates while showing substantial inter-individual variability. Performance across all cognitive assessments was consistent with published validation studies of the corresponding tasks. Across the full battery, adaptive procedures demonstrated reliable convergence and generated well-distributed performance measures without evidence of substantial floor or ceiling effects. Importantly, these findings were observed across four geographically distributed testing sites using standardized consumer-grade tablet hardware. Conclusions: PLFest provides reliable and scalable assessment of visual and cognitive function using portable consumer devices. The platform supports standardized data collection across distributed research settings while maintaining performance characteristics consistent with established laboratory and clinical benchmarks. These findings support the use of PLFest as a reliable framework for large-scale studies of vision and cognition. Translational Relevance: By reducing dependence on specialized laboratory infrastructure and trained personnel, PLFest may facilitate broader access to visual and cognitive assessment, enabling large-scale research, screening, and future rehabilitation applications.

Continuous Psychophysics, which couples a continuous stimulus with a continuous response, is a promising tool to break out of the confines of traditional designs based on discrete trials. In this pre-registered study, we explore to what extent this paradigm is useful in the study of multisensory integration. We expand on Tonelli et al.s (2025) seminal study by additionally examining the role of eye-movements, using a Kalman filter to estimate the sensory noise underlying behavioral tracking parameters and employing a virtual reality set-up. We immersed two cohorts of participants (n = 30 each) in a virtual meadow environment and asked them to continuously track a drone (Experiment 1) or a swarm of flies (Experiment 2) with a controller, while simultaneously recording their eye movements. We manipulated the reliability of visual cues using four levels of fog (from a completely clear view to impenetrable fog where no visual cues to the targets position were available) as well as the presence of sound cues emitted from the object (sound present/absent). The maximum correlation between stimulus and response was higher when sound was present in some conditions, particularly when visual uncertainty was high, while the tracking delay remained unaffected across all fog levels. Using a Kalman filter to estimate the underlying sensory noise, we found strong evidence that sensory noise was lower when sound was present than when sound was absent both for manual and for ocular tracking, particularly for those conditions with higher visual uncertainty. In exploratory analyses, we further show strong correlations between manual and ocular tracking in all measures (maximum correlation, tracking delay, sensory precision). However, when isolating the multisensory advantage, these correlations all but disappeared for maximum correlation and tracking delay, while remaining substantial for sensory precision. Similarly, behavioral tracking correlated generally strongly with underlying sensory noise, but much less so when it came to the advantage conferred by added sound cues. Our results show that continuous psychophysics is well-suited for the study of multisensory integration, particularly when a Kalman filter analysis is used to estimate sensory uncertainty from behavioral data.

Current debates regarding the relative contribution of saliency versus semantics to gaze control often rely on comparing the predictive power of saliency and meaning maps. We argue that such indirect, global approaches are fundamentally limited because fixations arise from heterogeneous, local causes that are conflated in whole-scene comparisons. To substantiate this claim, we used a direct method where participants explicitly identified the reasons for fixation at specific clusters of high fixation density, distinguishing between low-level saliency and various semantic categories, as well as the most important one. The obtained judgments revealed that multiple factors contribute simultaneously to gaze control. Although their influence varied across fixation clusters, semantics generally dominated saliency. Notably, abstract semantic categories, particularly "unknown/unusual," proved important, highlighting the role of prior knowledge and novelty besides personal relevance in guiding attention. To interpret these findings in the context of existing models, we propose a framework distinguishing between processes highlighting interesting locations in the image from a sampling strategy translating this information into scanpaths. Within this framework, classic saliency and meaning maps are viewed as restricted inputs to the strategy, whereas deep learning-based models (e.g., DeepGaze IIE) are more general and may also implicitly encode aspects of the strategy itself. Consistent with this, we found that the predictive performance of DeepGaze IIE varied less significantly with the specific reasons for fixation than that of classic saliency and meaning map approaches.

Certain conscious contents--such as the covert name of a viewed object--arise involuntarily and resist suppression, a phenomenon captured by the Reflexive Imagery Task (RIT). Whether a subliminal prime can bias which of two simultaneously present objects captures such an involuntary naming response has not been established. We adapted a two-object RIT into a self-contained, browser-based instrument. Thirty-eight adults (M age = 21.6 years, SD = 2.3; 26 female) viewed 24 object pairs and were instructed to fixate a central cross, to refrain from thinking of the objects names, and to click an object whenever its name intruded into awareness. On each trial a masked prime (17 ms, flanked by pattern masks) was either the exact name of one object (Exact Word Prime), a semantic associate of one object (Semantic Prime), or a neutral string (No Prime), defining a primed side per trial. A post-experiment debriefing confirmed that participants noticed the masks but none consciously perceived or could identify the prime words, indicating that the primes were subliminal. Analyses excluded 91 of 912 trials (10.0%) with more than five clicks. The priming effect was robust across measures: an omnibus comparison of clicks across conditions was significant (Friedman {chi}{superscript 2}(2) = 6.59, p = .037); within both prime conditions participants clicked the primed side more than the not-primed side (Exact Word, p = .039; Semantic, p = .005); and the primed-to-not-primed ratio exceeded parity by roughly 57-59% (Laplace-smoothed ratio {approx} 1.58; one-sample Wilcoxon p < .001 for each). A Bayesian Poisson generalized linear mixed model with random participant intercepts confirmed a credible primed-side advantage (incidence rate ratio = 1.72, 95% credible interval [1.57, 1.90]) that did not differ between prime types. No general left/right response bias emerged. An exploratory ight-side x Exact Word Prime interaction was inconsistent across model classes and is reported as hypothesis-generating. The findings indicate that subliminal lexical and semantic primes can steer the spatial locus of involuntary object naming.

Human spatial representations are often assumed to represent Euclidean properties such as length, distance, and angle. Here we test an alternative (but not mutually exclusive) possibility - that spatial memory is structured primarily around topological relations. Across four experiments, adults and children memorized simple letter-like figures and reproduced them by drawing, allowing the contents of their spatial representations to be revealed directly. Drawings showed systematic distortions of metric features, including strong biases of angles toward 90{degrees} and compression of line length towards an average value. In contrast, topologically critical features -- such as T-junctions and holes -- were reliably preserved, even relative to closely matched but topologically irrelevant features like L-junctions. These effects were magnified in a serial reproduction paradigm, in which participants iteratively generated new drawings from previous participant drawings: At the end of each mnemonic chain, figures converged on simplified topological structures as metric detail degraded. Similar patterns were observed in children aged five to eight years. Together, these findings suggest that basic topological relations may function as primitive building blocks of human spatial representation, with metric detail encoded secondarily. Significance statementThe iconic map of the London Underground is one of the most famous maps in history, yet something special about it goes unnoticed: it is not a veridical representation of space. Distances are arbitrary, and angles are presented only in coarse terms. Yet the ubiquity and appeal of such maps suggests that topological representation is intuitive -- as if the mind is keen to receive information in exactly this way. Here, using drawing as a tool, we show directly that the most primitive form of spatial representation appears to be a topological skeleton. Remarkably, even children as young as five represent spatial structure in topological terms, with roughly the same fidelity as adults -- pointing to an underappreciated building block of spatial representation.